On 6/12/24 10:37, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
*/If "mail system support for SMTPUTF8 addresses isn't ubiquitous" isn't a given, then both use cases can be approached differently. If it is a given, we have a requirement to continue to support exchange of all-ASCII email addresses. An extension can be defined to add support for the exchange of an optional SMTPUTF8 address, but we can’t eliminate the need for an all-ASCII address./*
I would use the word "reliable" instead of "ubiquitous". It does not seem reasonable for us to create complexity for something that hasn't and likely will not happen, so this seems right to me.
I was under the impression that we had decided this or a similar path was the way to go back in August.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/6R0bkJM0I3lMJf8kH3d8s4TqEiQ/ -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list -- regext@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to regext-le...@ietf.org
