Kind Regards,
Pawel Am 20.10.23 um 10:13 schrieb Maarten Wullink:
Andy, Thank you for your kind offer to give up your agenda items. It would be nice if we could have a discussion about RESTful EPP in Prague MaartenOp 19 okt 2023, om 14:53 heeft Andrew Newton <a...@hxr.us> het volgende geschreven: [You don't often get email from a...@hxr.us. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Antoin, I'm willing to give up agenda items 6.iv. (rdap-extensions) and 6.v. (rdap-x-media-type) to give Maarten 10 minutes to discuss restful EPP. To me that seems like a better use of face-to-face time as both of my drafts got time at the last IETF. -andy On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 3:27 PM Antoin Verschuren <ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:Hi Maarten, Unfortunately, our agenda for IETF 118 is already fully booked with no space to overrun. Perhaps we should consider a 2 hour meeting request for next IETF 119. Regards, AntoinOp 16 okt. 2023, om 17:52 heeft Maarten Wullink <maarten.wullink=40sidn...@dmarc.ietf.org> het volgende geschreven: Hi Antoin, Maybe a bit late, but would it be possible to add a few minutes for a discussion about the usefulness of REST enabled EPP. Thanks! Maarten see below for my motivation from a mail to the list last week: Seeing that more and more registries are moving their infrastructure into the cloud, it might be a good time to take look again at the transport used for EPP. Adding a method for easily running EPP services in the cloud could make things easier for registries and registrars. some of the advantages i see are: - scaling epp services will be easier, run many stateless epp services - rate limiting HTTP is easy compared to EPP TCP session and can use standard tooling for this - more in line with modern web development (restful APIs) - good support for monitoring of http based services 11 years ago we proposed to add a restful transport option (see url to draft below), at the time it got no traction but things haven changed quiet a bit since then, is this something worthy of our time to look into again? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wullink-restful-epp-00 _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
smime.p7s
Description: Kryptografische S/MIME-Signatur
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
