Andy, Thank you for your kind offer to give up your agenda items. It would be nice if we could have a discussion about RESTful EPP in Prague
Maarten > Op 19 okt 2023, om 14:53 heeft Andrew Newton <a...@hxr.us> het volgende > geschreven: > > [You don't often get email from a...@hxr.us. Learn why this is important at > https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > Antoin, > > I'm willing to give up agenda items 6.iv. (rdap-extensions) and 6.v. > (rdap-x-media-type) to give Maarten 10 minutes to discuss restful EPP. > To me that seems like a better use of face-to-face time as both of my > drafts got time at the last IETF. > > -andy > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 3:27 PM Antoin Verschuren > <ietf=40antoin...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Maarten, >> >> Unfortunately, our agenda for IETF 118 is already fully booked with no space >> to overrun. >> Perhaps we should consider a 2 hour meeting request for next IETF 119. >> >> Regards, >> >> Antoin >> >>> Op 16 okt. 2023, om 17:52 heeft Maarten Wullink >>> <maarten.wullink=40sidn...@dmarc.ietf.org> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Hi Antoin, >>> >>> Maybe a bit late, but would it be possible to add a few minutes for a >>> discussion about the usefulness of REST enabled EPP. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Maarten >>> >>> >>> see below for my motivation from a mail to the list last week: >>> >>> >>> Seeing that more and more registries are moving their infrastructure into >>> the cloud, it might be a good time to take look again at the transport used >>> for EPP. >>> Adding a method for easily running EPP services in the cloud could make >>> things easier for registries and registrars. >>> >>> some of the advantages i see are: >>> >>> - scaling epp services will be easier, run many stateless epp services >>> - rate limiting HTTP is easy compared to EPP TCP session and can use >>> standard tooling for this >>> - more in line with modern web development (restful APIs) >>> - good support for monitoring of http based services >>> >>> 11 years ago we proposed to add a restful transport option (see url to >>> draft below), at the time it got no traction but things haven changed quiet >>> a bit since then, is this something worthy of our time to look into again? >>> >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wullink-restful-epp-00 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> regext mailing list >>> regext@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext >> >> _______________________________________________ >> regext mailing list >> regext@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
