(forgot to cc regext)
Big fan of this document and feel it is good. I have only one small nit: See also "domain name" in [RFC8499]. Should this not be "Domain name" (per 8499) ? I have a deeper question on using "ext" for extension - it feels like an abbreviation which doesn't feel useful. But I'm no expert on matters of the written word. tim On Mon, Feb 6, 2023 at 9:40 AM James Galvin <gal...@elistx.com> wrote: > The document editors have indicated that the following document is ready > for submission to the IESG to be considered for publication as a Proposed > Standard: > > Registration Data Dictionary > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-datadictionary/03/ > > Please indicate your support or no objection for the publication of this > document by replying to this message on list (a simple “+1” is sufficient). > > If any working group member has questions regarding the the publication of > this document please respond on the list with your concerns by close of > business everywhere, Monday, 20 February 2023. If there are no objections > the document will be submitted to the IESG. > > The Document Shepherd for this document is Stéphane Bortzmeyer. > > Thanks, > > Antoin and Jim > REGEXT WG Co-Chairs > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
