Hi all, I was looking at the diffs between -16 and -17 of the EAI drafts, and the draft looks to have doubled in size since being submitted to the IESG. A lot of the new content are examples (always a good thing), but there has been some other normative language added. Does that need to be discussed in the WG?
For example, one of the new sections is the transition section (8). On the whole, I think it is very good advice. But I fear it is too proscriptive for all cases. -andy _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
