Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-rfc7484bis/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [S5.2 & 13.2, comment] * It's probably better to refer to RFC 5952 for IPv6 text representations. (If not, why not?) [S5.3, comment] * It might be good to place additional restrictions on the ordering of AS numbers in the range syntax to require increasing order, ["101-202"], and not allow ["202-101"]. _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
