On Thu, Nov 19, 2020, at 10:20, Klaus Malorny wrote: > What I regard as suboptimal in respect to the proposed EPP extension [1] > is the big effort for the little issue (RFC-wise and > implementation-wise), and also using this dummy placeholder [EAI-DUMMY]
Using such kind of placeholder, like it was done for login-security seems to me just a poor way to try doing basically whatever XML namespaces are trying to do without doing it properly. I sincerely do not hope this is the way things are going (speaking as an implementer of multiple EPP servers and clients). -- Patrick Mevzek p...@dotandco.com _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
