From: Dmitry Belyavsky <beld...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 4:12 PM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>
Cc: Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com>; jo...@taugh.com; regext@ietf.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Internationalized Email Addresses and EPP






On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:03 PM Hollenbeck, Scott 
<shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
 wrote:

   > -----Original Message-----
   > From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> On 
Behalf Of Gould, James
   > Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 2:50 PM
   > To: jo...@taugh.com<mailto:jo...@taugh.com>; 
regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
   > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Internationalized Email Addresses and EPP
   >
   > John,
   >
   > The signal would be handled via support for an EPP extension XML
   > namespace in option 2, an operational practice XML namespace in what I
   > would call 2b, or most likely a new contact XML namespace (contact-1.1) in
   > option 1 for RFC 5733.  The XML namespace would be reflected in the EPP
   > greeting services and login services.

   I'm more a fan of using an extension with a new namespace than I am a fan of 
trying to update 5733. An extension would be more easily consumed by other 
extensions that use email addresses vs. having to also update all existing 
extensions that use email addresses.



   Adding support of an extension is harder than just allowing EAI email 
addresses, both for registries and registrars.

   Also, we get some fuzziness on implementation level. E.g., can we set ASCII 
email via this extension?

   [SAH] I disagree on both points. Extensions are, by definition, opt-in. 
Registries and registrars can add support for them as they see fit. By changing 
the core protocol we impose a mandate for implementation. I’d rather not do 
that until we know that all elements of the underlying mail system (SMTP 
servers, mail stores, etc) support EAI email addresses. Extensions are 
additive, so yes, it’ll be possible to support both the legacy email addresses 
and the extended addresses if the extension is done properly.



   Scott

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to