Hi Scott,
Il 20/10/2020 15:00, Hollenbeck, Scott ha scritto:
*From:* regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Mario Loffredo
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 20, 2020 8:42 AM
*To:* regext@ietf.org
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [regext] Fwd: Re: IANA Considerations in
draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
Hi all,
as a consequence of last discussion about rdapConformance, I propose
to update RFC7483bis in order to clarify that rdapConformance in the
help response must be used to signal the conformances with all the
specifications implemented by the RDAP server. For any other response,
rdapConformance must provide only hints as to the specifications used
in the construction of the response.
*/[SAH] This makes sense./*
Additionally, I wonder whether or not the rdapConformance values
should be returned according to the user profile. Does an RDAP user
really need to know about services that he won't be able to request?
*/[SAH] What user profile? There’s no such thing described in the
specifications./*
/*I was simply referring to what is described in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7481#section-3.3
*/
/*Mario*/
*//*
*/Scott/*
--
Dr. Mario Loffredo
Systems and Technological Development Unit
Institute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT)
National Research Council (CNR)
via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 PISA, Italy
Phone: +39.0503153497
Mobile: +39.3462122240
Web: http://www.iit.cnr.it/mario.loffredo
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
