From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Mario Loffredo Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2020 8:42 AM To: regext@ietf.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Fwd: Re: IANA Considerations in draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search
Hi all, as a consequence of last discussion about rdapConformance, I propose to update RFC7483bis in order to clarify that rdapConformance in the help response must be used to signal the conformances with all the specifications implemented by the RDAP server. For any other response, rdapConformance must provide only hints as to the specifications used in the construction of the response. [SAH] This makes sense. Additionally, I wonder whether or not the rdapConformance values should be returned according to the user profile. Does an RDAP user really need to know about services that he won't be able to request? [SAH] What user profile? There’s no such thing described in the specifications. Scott
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
