We could update the contact scheme version to indicate the EAI support as it is relevant for the contract mapping only.
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, 18:51 John Levine, <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > In article <542572b0e6284550a9bee035bea2d...@verisign.com> you write: > > [SAH] Perhaps there’s a case to be made for RFC 6530 being an update > to RFC 5322. I’m going to see if I can run some tests to > >confirm it, but I, too, suspect that EPP as-is won’t have any issues with > internationalized email addresses. > > Urrgh. RFC 6530 is not an update to 5322. Don't go there. I agree there > is no > great technical problem sending UTF-8 address strings through EPP. > > I'm getting the impression that what we need is a way for the client > to ask the registry whether it can handle EAI addresses so it knows > what to accept registrants. I can imagine a variety of ways to do that. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext >
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
