On Tue, Sep 8, 2020, at 08:26, Gould, James wrote: > > Both draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces and > draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer are BCP drafts. We have > discussed the status of these drafts informally at prior REGEXT > meetings and more formally at the IETF-108 REGEXT meeting. Both drafts > don’t define protocol, but define operational practices of using the > existing EPP RFCs in a more secure or more compliant way. I believe > the drafts best match the purpose of a BCP. Please respond on the list > with your support for the BCP track or if you believe a different track > should be used for one or both drafts.
I believe they both should be "Experimental" instead. They are not long term widespread "current practices" at all. As for "best" ones, I am still reserved. -- Patrick Mevzek p...@dotandco.com _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
