Both draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces and draft-ietf-regext-secure-authinfo-transfer are BCP drafts. We have discussed the status of these drafts informally at prior REGEXT meetings and more formally at the IETF-108 REGEXT meeting. Both drafts don’t define protocol, but define operational practices of using the existing EPP RFCs in a more secure or more compliant way. I believe the drafts best match the purpose of a BCP. Please respond on the list with your support for the BCP track or if you believe a different track should be used for one or both drafts.
Thanks, -- JG [cid:image001.png@01D255E2.EB933A30] James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com<applewebdata://13890C55-AAE8-4BF3-A6CE-B4BA42740803/jgo...@verisign.com> 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com<http://verisigninc.com/>
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
