As an FYI, we're not the only ones less than in love with jCard.

-andy

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Bron Gondwana <br...@fastmailteam.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 4:22 AM
Subject: [dispatch] Requesting DISPATCH of JSContact
To: <dispa...@ietf.org>


Hi All,

As work concludes on
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-calext-jscalendar-11 there is
interest in doing the same thing with a format for contacts.

The JSCalendar work grew out of the JMAP specification at
https://jmap.io/spec-calendars.html <https://jmap..io/spec-calendars.html>
- there was interest in producing a standalone format which was JSON-native
rather the RFC7265's quite mechanical translation of iCalendar, which is
confusing and unfamiliar to programmers used to working with JSON data.

Likewise, JMAP Contacts contains an early attempt at translating VCARD into
an easily understood JSON format.  The shape of it is defined at
https://jmap.io/spec-contacts.html - though I expect it would undergo
significant revision before submission for publication.   We are aware of
both RFC6350 and RFC7095 and would both use them as a guideline and define
mappings between them and a new JSON-first format.

I have already spoken to the ART ADs about this, and they agree that
dispatch is the correct venue to discuss this proposal.  The JMAP working
group could take it on, but has been mostly focused on the protocols around
the formats rather than that formats itself (other than mail).  The CALEXT
working group has would be a potential place, if it was to recharter and
increase scope to both contacts and calendars (since they seem to travel
together in many places due to the use of DAV for both).  Or maybe
something else.

I'm also aware of work within ISO to define address formats and structured
name formats which are less western-centric than the existing VCARD 'N' and
'ADR' structured fields.  This format would try to remain backwards
compatible with those fields while having a defined way to express the new
formats.

I have asked that the existing JMAP work be put into an initial draft so we
have a baseline in IETF style, knowing full well that it is likely to
change significantly.

Cheers,

Bron.

--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd
  br...@fastmailteam.com


_______________________________________________
dispatch mailing list
dispa...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to