I think the unclarity here is about the nature of causation, and more specifically about the priority of events. Because the exchange of private data between a registrar and a VSP on the one hand, and the use of the verification code on the other hand, is of a necessary deterministic nature, I do think the considerations are applicable.
(more about the nature of causation in the chapter Causation, in: "Gerring, John. 2011, 'Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework', Cambridge University Press, UK" - I can share the chapter with you if you contact me off-list) Best, Niels On 12/18/18 10:59 PM, Andrew Newton wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:20 PM Gould, James <jgo...@verisign.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, draft-ietf-regext-verificationcode defines the structure of the >> verification code that is passed between the EPP client (registrar) to the >> EPP server (registry) to show that the verification occurred before the EPP >> transaction. >> > > Thanks for the _verification_, James. :) > > I think this means the premise for the privacy considerations is > nonexistent, and therefore the text given is not applicable. > > -andy > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > -- Niels ten Oever Researcher and PhD Candidate Datactive Research Group University of Amsterdam PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488 643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3 _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
