On 06/11/18 11:49 PM, Andrew Newton wrote: > 2. In my opinion, I do not believe a human rights considerations > section would negatively impact the readability of this draft if > written properly. That said, the text put forward in the other thread > is certainly not acceptable as it has the tone of "only people who > crush cute puppies under their boots would do this". The text should > be neutral in its advice and merely note the issues, as we see with > most security considerations in the IETF. The text I read said a lot > of things "will" happen instead of "may" happen. >
Thanks. Just wanted to clarify here to avoid any confusion: the HR review is NOT the proposed text for the human rights considerations section for the draft. I will be drafting a paragraph or two as my proposition for the HRC section, and will be sharing it on this list. Thanks for your feedback, I will take it into account when I draft it. Thank you. Gurshabad
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
