Dear Linlin, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 02:19:45PM +0800, Linlin Zhou wrote: > Dear Benjamin, > Thanks for your input. We believe that relationship between an object and an > organization should be 1-to-1, one organization ID with just one role. > 1-to-many is an exception for the organization extension. Indeed that is our > concern, "the multiple examples may be overkill". Many thanks.
I won't object to requiring the 1-to-1 mapping, as the impact of the restriction seems minor. I am not entirely sure where the best place to add some text that clarifies this restriction would be; perhaps in Section 4.2.1 where we describe the <orgext:id> elements in <create>? (I assume that the formal syntax does not provide for a maxOccurs that applies per-type.) It may also be worth a (non-normative) reminder in the <update> description that the semantics of <orgext:chg> are well-defined because there is only one entry per role value, but I'm not sure about that. Thanks, Benjamin _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
