Sorry, I should have sent this to the list, too.
Scott From: Hollenbeck, Scott Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 10:35 AM To: 'j...@afilias.info' <j...@afilias.info> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: Re: Re: [regext] Document Shepherd check on draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05 Actually, there is one more thing: an entry should be added to the IANA Considerations section to add this extension to the EPP extensions registry found here: https://www.iana.org/assignments/epp-extensions/epp-extensions.xhtml The registration template can be found in Section 2.2.1 of RFC 7451: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7451 Scott From: Joseph Yee <j...@afilias.info<mailto:j...@afilias.info>> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 10:08 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com<mailto:shollenb...@verisign.com>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: Re: Re: [regext] Document Shepherd check on draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05 Thank you! -Joseph On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:22 PM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com<mailto:shollenb...@verisign.com>> wrote: Yes, all addressed. Thank you. Scott On Oct 24, 2018, at 4:35 PM, Joseph Yee <j...@afilias.info<mailto:j...@afilias.info>> wrote: HI Scott, Do the current draft address all your concerns? Thanks. Best, Joseph On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:05 AM Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com<mailto:shollenb...@verisign.com>> wrote: Thanks, Jiankang. Scott From: Jiankang Yao <ya...@cnnic.cn<mailto:ya...@cnnic.cn>> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 5:50 AM To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com<mailto:shollenb...@verisign.com>>; jyee <j...@afilias.info<mailto:j...@afilias.info>>; regext <regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: [regext] Document Shepherd check on draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05 Dear Scott, Thanks for your kind support and review. The version 06 has been updated to address your concerns. https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-06.txt section 7.2.3. EPP <renew> Command section 7.2.4. EPP <transfer> Command section 7.2.5. EPP <update> Command have refined the text and added the example according to your kind suggestion. Section 11. Security Considerations has been updated to add some words related security. CNNIC and some other registries have implemented this document, and tested the examples. Thanks a lot. _____ Jiankang Yao From: Hollenbeck, Scott<mailto:shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: 2018-10-02 19:29 To: 'j...@afilias.info'<mailto:j...@afilias.info>; 'regext@ietf.org'<mailto:regext@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [regext] Document Shepherd check on draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05 I don’t recall seeing any discussion of or text changes to address my feedback. Here’s my note: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/regext/current/msg01541.html Scott From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Joseph Yee Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 5:15 PM To: regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Document Shepherd check on draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05 HI all, I'm the document shepherd of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05. During review. The WG had made a last call on its -03 version (subject: [regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-03), and Scott Hollenbeck supported the publication but also raised concern on security consideration. I have not see any further discussion on this, I would like to ask whether WG closed the issue. Thanks to all. Best, Joseph
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
