Thanks, Jiankang.


Scott



From: Jiankang Yao <ya...@cnnic.cn>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2018 5:50 AM
To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>; jyee <j...@afilias.info>; 
regext <regext@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: [regext] Document Shepherd check on 
draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05



Dear Scott,



  Thanks for your kind support and review.

  The version 06 has been updated to address your concerns.

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-06.txt





section  7.2.3.  EPP <renew> Command

 section  7.2.4.  EPP <transfer> Command

section  7.2.5.  EPP <update> Command

have refined the text and added the example according to your kind suggestion.



Section  11.  Security Considerations   has been updated to add some words 
related security.





CNNIC and some other registries have implemented this document, and tested the 
examples.



Thanks a lot.

  _____

Jiankang Yao



From: Hollenbeck, Scott<mailto:shollenbeck=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org>

Date: 2018-10-02 19:29

To: 'j...@afilias.info'<mailto:j...@afilias.info>; 
'regext@ietf.org'<mailto:regext@ietf.org>

Subject: Re: [regext] Document Shepherd check on 
draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05

I don’t recall seeing any discussion of or text changes to address my feedback. 
Here’s my note:



https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/regext/current/msg01541.html



Scott



From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org>> On 
Behalf Of Joseph Yee
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 5:15 PM
To: regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [regext] Document Shepherd check on 
draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05



HI all,



I'm the document shepherd of draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-05.  
During review. The WG had made a last call on its -03 version (subject: 
[regext] WGLC: draft-ietf-regext-bundling-registration-03), and Scott 
Hollenbeck supported the publication but also raised concern on security 
consideration.



I have not see any further discussion on this, I would like to ask whether WG 
closed the issue. Thanks to all.



Best,

Joseph



_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to