On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 02:08:38PM +0200, Niels ten Oever wrote: > We might disagree here. If there is one place in which this extension > might be useful, I am not sure whether standardization is appropriate > because there is only one (potential) implementation. That leads me to > the question: has this actually been implemented in the case of .gov?
On the other hand, if people want to standardize some mechanism for a policy you find regrettable, I find it hard to believe that the right answer is "prevent that standard" rather than "don't subject yourself to that policy". The latter is easily achieved by refusing to do business with registries that implement a policy you don't like. The approach that seems to be being pursued here is to try to prevent standardization of the mechanism because of a disagreement about the policy. I think that is generally bad for interoperability. Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.com _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
