> -----Original Message----- > From: Niels ten Oever <li...@digitaldissidents.org> > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 8:09 AM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>; > 'jgould=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org' > <jgould=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> > Cc: 'hr...@irtf.org' <hr...@irtf.org>; 'h...@irtf.org' <h...@irtf.org>; > 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org>; 'gursha...@cis-india.org' > <gursha...@cis-india.org> > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Human Rights Review of draft-ietf-regext- > verificationcode > > On 10/05/2018 01:14 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Niels ten Oever <li...@digitaldissidents.org> > >> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2018 4:20 AM > >> To: Hollenbeck, Scott <shollenb...@verisign.com>; > >> 'jgould=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org' > >> <jgould=40verisign....@dmarc.ietf.org> > >> Cc: 'hr...@irtf.org' <hr...@irtf.org>; 'h...@irtf.org' > >> <h...@irtf.org>; 'regext@ietf.org' <regext@ietf.org>; 'gurshabad@cis- > india.org' > >> <gursha...@cis-india.org> > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Human Rights Review of > >> draft-ietf-regext- verificationcode > >> > >> On 10/04/2018 08:34 PM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > >>> Here's one example of a regulation that could be met using the > >>> approach described in the draft: > >>> > >>> https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=d611d7d4bd8f3155d3262ea485 > >>> 7c > >>> 011e&mc=true&node=pt41.3.102_6173&rgn=div5 > >>> > >>> The draft does not use terms like "obligatory" or "demand". As it > >>> says in the Introduction, "A locality MAY ...". > >>> > >> > >> If there is only one instance in which this MAY be useful, perhaps > >> there is no need for standardization of this extension? > > > > If there is at least one example, there is a demonstration of existence > of utility. > > > > We might disagree here. If there is one place in which this extension > might be useful, I am not sure whether standardization is appropriate > because there is only one (potential) implementation. That leads me to the > question: has this actually been implemented in the case of .gov?
It has not. This extension can, however, be used by any EPP-using entities that have verification requirements - and there are more than one of those. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
