Patrick, There is no intention to request for this to be a working group document until the IPR declaration is defined. We already provided the IPR disclosure.
Thanks, — JG James Gould Distinguished Engineer [email protected] 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com <http://verisigninc.com/> On 7/17/18, 3:36 AM, "regext on behalf of Patrick Mevzek" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: I discovered this myself just before the meeting when preparing it but Scott also clearly mentioned it during the meeting (thanks for that): there is currently an IPR on this extension, with the case of "details will be provided later". You may recall that we were in a similar case for the keyRelay extension, and it got delayed because at some point noone knew anymore who was waiting on what and then discussions were needed to decide if going through or still waiting on the full IPR. I would prefer if the same situation does not repeat itself, so I am just wondering what can be done to make that going smoothly? -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
