> -----Original Message----- > From: regext <regext-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Patrick Mevzek > Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2018 3:37 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] Tidbits after monday meeting, related to > registry mapping extension => IPR > > I discovered this myself just before the meeting when preparing it but > Scott also clearly mentioned it during the meeting (thanks for that): > there is currently an IPR on this extension, with the case of "details > will be provided later". > > > You may recall that we were in a similar case for the keyRelay extension, > and it got delayed because at some point noone knew anymore who was > waiting on what and then discussions were needed to decide if going > through or still waiting on the full IPR. > > I would prefer if the same situation does not repeat itself, so I am just > wondering what can be done to make that going smoothly?
It would be helpful if I could provide a measure of implementation interest to my corporate attorneys. That would help them come up with an appropriate declaration. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
