Hello,
On 26/04/2018 13:21, InterNetX - Marco Schrieck wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> we found out that different registries have a strange behave while
> removing v6 addresses.
>
> I think its not clearly defined that host address should be normalized
> for comparison.
>
> In our case a host info return:
>
> <host:addr ip="v6">2001:4b3:624:1::b051</host:addr>
>
> An Update is done with following:
>
> <host:rem>
> <host:addr ip="v6">2001:4b3:624:1:0:0:0:b051</host:addr>
> </host:rem>
>
> and it failed on registry side.
>
> What should be the correct behave in such situations ?
While it may not be explicitly specified, I think that anything but
normalizing the addresses prior to a comparison would be highly
unprofessional. It wouldn't cross my mind to regard the two addresses
above as different in this context.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
____________________________________________________________________
| |
| knipp | Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
------- Technologiepark
Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 9
44227 Dortmund
Deutschland
Dipl.-Informatiker Tel: +49 231 9703-0
Thomas Corte Fax: +49 231 9703-200
Stellvertretender Leiter SIP: thomas.co...@knipp.de
Software-Entwicklung E-Mail: thomas.co...@knipp.de
Registereintrag:
Amtsgericht Dortmund, HRB 13728
Geschäftsführer:
Dietmar Knipp, Elmar Knipp
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
