While my experience is more with host attributes registries, I wonder if removing the single address of a host object would be forbidden because that is actually leaving the object with no content at all. Does the same happen if the object already had a v4 and a v6 address, and you then remove one of them ?
Rubens > On 26 Apr 2018, at 08:21, InterNetX - Marco Schrieck > <marco.schri...@internetx.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > we found out that different registries have a strange behave while > removing v6 addresses. > > I think its not clearly defined that host address should be normalized > for comparison. > > In our case a host info return: > > <host:addr ip="v6">2001:4b3:624:1::b051</host:addr> > > An Update is done with following: > > <host:rem> > <host:addr ip="v6">2001:4b3:624:1:0:0:0:b051</host:addr> > </host:rem> > > and it failed on registry side. > > What should be the correct behave in such situations ? > > > Regards > > Marco Schrieck > > > PS: > IP addresses are anonymized. > > > -- > InterNetX GmbH > Johanna-Dachs-Str. 55 > 93055 Regensburg > Germany > > Tel. +49 941 59559-0 > Fax +49 941 59579-050 > > www.internetx.com > www.facebook.com/InterNetX > www.twitter.com/InterNetX > > Geschäftsführer: > Thomas Mörz (CEO), Hakan Ali > Amtsgericht Regensburg, HRB 7142 > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
