On Wed, Apr 18, 2018, at 13:07, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > This is worth exploring. What do people think about going back to HYPHEN > MINUS as a separator and noting the significance of the character with > an "objectTag-0" token in the rdapConformance array? The draft should > probably include text requiring addition of an "objectTag-0" token in > the rdapConformance array to note support for this practice no matter > which separator character is used.
Whatever character is used, I think it creates no harms and only benefits to put something (whatever token is best) inside the rdapConformance array to signal to clients that object IDs are returned with some specific format, so that they are aware of it. And things remain compatible with current registries not using a specific format and hence not adding this token. -- Patrick Mevzek p...@dotandco.com _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
