Pieter,

On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, at 15:39, Pieter Vandepitte wrote:
> No, indeed it isn't about discovering entities, but discovering the 
> authoritative server for an entity, basically wat is meant with 
> bootstrapping. 

[..]

> So my final vote on this draft: if there's a need for "globally unique 
> handles" (I'm not convinced they are needed to help the clients), then 
> yes, go ahead, but I would prefer a hyphen (it works, as long as the 
> repos do not have hyphens), the same as roid in EPP.


FWIW, note that I completely share both your observations and your conclusions.
So that you do not feel alone :-), we are at least too, but clearly the 
minority. Such is life.


More broadly, I am doubly sad that hyphen is rejected because already seen 
elsewhere.

First, because RDAP for domain names has not reached critical mass and far from 
it in fact (newer discussions on GDPR should have ressuscited it since it is 
clearly suited for it, but things being done at the last time did not make
it possible I guess to think about it, and I applaud Scott's energy and 
experiments on authentication models for it), so no characters should be 
ignored just because some other registries did start to use it.
When IDNs started, before IDNA became a standard, names were sold and used with 
the bq-- prefix. This was absolutely not a reason not to choose a "proper" 
prefix, even if it meant at the time to break any existing bq-- domain names

Secondly, not using hyphens will make it very hard for anyone to convince me 
that there is really an overlap between EPP and RDAP (which was a core 
justification to create this WG), as hyphen is clearly the choice in EPP.

The rdapConformance part could have a "objectTag-0" token whose presence would 
signal the client that the hyphen in object IDs has a special meaning because 
it is a separator. This would allow current registries using hyphens not as 
separator to continue working in the same way as they would not present this 
"extension" in their response. Client would just need to adapt, but it is the 
case what ever happens and characters is used since there is no guarantee that 
all IDs, even in the same repository, will be formatted with it.

-- 
  Patrick Mevzek
  p...@dotandco.com

_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to