In article <1515959505.2078965.1235045832.602c6...@webmail.messagingengine.com> you write: >I think that would be me.
Ah, right. >> Since you can get the effect of a DNAME in the root zone >> by putting a DNAME at the apex of a TLD as Taiwan has done, if people >> want more root-ish DNAMEs it might be more productive to consider how >> to invent a policy to allow a DNAME-only TLD if you're not a ccTLD. > >But this won't be ontopic in this WG. Well, OK, but the logic of we have to do something bad because we would have to walk down the hall to do something better escapes me. R's, John _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
