> -----Original Message----- > From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Patrick > Mevzek > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 4:02 AM > To: regext@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [regext] draft-brown-epp-fees: <fee:balance> in > <domain:check> ? > > Le lundi 06 juin 2016 à 06:43 +0000, Alexander Mayrhofer a écrit : > > Neither of the options we came up with is particularly elegant - does > > anybody have better ideas? > > > > There is already one extension dealing exclusively with balance > handling: > http://www.verisign.com/assets/epp-sdk/verisign_epp- > extension_balance_v00.html > > Why not keep the 2 aspects (fee & balance) separated ? > Since there are registries not using a prepayment model, hence where > the balance has no meaning, but the fee part is useful.
FWIW Verisign has no IPR claims for the balance mapping. It can be freely implemented by anyone. Scott _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
