Hello, I would suggest a slight rewording/clarification of this sentence: If a <fee:fee> element has a "grace-period" attribute then it MUST also be refundable.
Does that mean 1) just that the client understands that the operation is refundable, without any technical obligation (in the same way as above you have explanations on what the clients should/should not make assumption on) OR 2) that the refundable attribute must be present with a true value? If it is the second case, then there is a slight problem not in this draft per se but the combination of it, plus RFC3915, plus ICANN AGP refund policy (the 10% or 50 domains). Our train of thought currently is to use the grace-period always as we have the information, but not using the refundable one because for create operations we can not compute in realtime refundable=0 or =1 as it depends on monthly volume of registrar activity. Hence my question on the 2 possible interpretations above and basically if the presence of the grace-period attribute implies the presence of the refundable attribute with some value? TIA, -- Patrick Mevzek _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
