On 5/6/02 8:05 AM, "Gary Stainburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Monday 06 May 2002 4:47 am, R Talbot wrote:
> [snip]
>> Glen
>>   I can understand your concern regarding security and I agree.
>> But....... my contention was with the other 210 megabytes which were not
>> a security update..
> 
> Sorry Rob, but I've got quite a chuckle over this thread.
> 
> If I ready it correctly, you're upset that RH continue to develop a system
> after they've frozen a release, and that they not only allow you unrestricted
> access to these improvements but supply a tool to automate that access.
> 
> This think - if it were available in the first place - how much you would
> have to PAY for this service from a company using a traditional sales model.
> 
> You have to bear in mind just what goes into developing, producing and
> distributing a CD set.  Then bear also bear in mind that this process is not
> actually RH's main income source.

Plus, this development allows you to choose the updates you're interested
in!
-- 
Ed Marczak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to