It would seem that some people have libcrypto.so.0.9.6 linked to libcrypto.so.2. I am not sure why people would do this....but some do.
In my case, I did not need libcrypto.so.2 to install net-snmp because I used the src and compiled myself, as opposed to using the RPM....I suggest that you try this too. Ross > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Noah Davis > Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 06:38 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: libcrypto.so.2 > > > Ok, sorry for dragging this topic on further, but I guess I'm dense and I > don't understand packaging and versioning. > > If I have openssl-0.9.6-9 on my system (containing > libcrypto.so.1), doesn't > that imply that I have a newer version of openssl than the > version I've been > seeking, openssl-0.9.6b-8 (containing libcrypto.so.2). What > exactly is this > numbering scheme - does the "b" stand for "beta" and the last digit the > release number? If all this is true, why does the older openssl-0.9.6b-8 > contain this newer libcrypto.so.2?! I'm losing me mind. > > Some system info: > > -- version of openssl on my system > # rpm -q openssl > openssl-0.9.6-9 > > -- libcrypto library it contains > # rpm -q openssl -l | grep libcrypto > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6 > > -- other libcryptos on my system > # locate -r libcrypto.so.* > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6 > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.1 > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.5a > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.0 > > > On Monday 08 April 2002 12:48 pm, you wrote: > > On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Noah Davis wrote: > > > OK, I got the package. If I try to upgrade it I get: > > > --------------------- > > > [root /home/noahd1/installers]# rpm -U --test > openssl-0.9.6b-8.i386.rpm > > > error: failed dependencies: > > > openssl = 0.9.6-9 is needed by openssl-devel-0.9.6-9 > > > openssl = 0.9.6-9 is needed by openssl-perl-0.9.6-9 > > > openssl = 0.9.6-9 is needed by openssl-python-0.9.6-9 > > > > This means you need to upgrade those as will (or remove them). > > > > > libcrypto.so.1 is needed by bind-utils-9.1.0-10 > > > libcrypto.so.1 is needed by slrn-0.9.6.4-2 > > > libcrypto.so.1 is needed by links-0.95-2 > > > > You'll need also a package called something like "openssl096" for > > these dependencies. You might be better off doing a full upgrade to > > Enigma or wait for Skipjack or Hampton or whatever the new distro is > > called. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Redhat-list mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
