BTW...there is an update to gcc that is available via up2date, which is
reputed to resolve the issues that caused it to not be suitable for kernel
compilation.
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Statux wrote:
> doesn't up2date require that priority access thing? or was that some other
> part of it. That also requires that you be running X and some other stuff.
>
> "7.0 has too many bugs" is meant to be read as "7.0's gcc package was
> b0rked due to an RTFM issue, and it will prolly take quite some time just
> getting it up and going half-alright." 6.2 is far easier (headache-wise)
> in comparison to upgrade to and then update. Personally, I'm sticking to
> 6.2 and then I'll see how 7.1 is. I Had 5.1, then 6.0, then 6.2.. so as you
> can see.. 7.1 is next in the pattern :)
>
> <shrug>
>
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Mike Burger wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Statux wrote:
> >
> > > stuff. You should consider upgrading to a newer version like 6.2 (7.0 has
> > > too many bugs in it).
> >
> > Many of which are addresed in the number of updates that are
> > available..."up2date" is your friend.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Redhat-list mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
