Ok, I found it interesting that the only reference to this gcc 2.96 update was simply "bug fixes". Well how about telling us what KIND of bug fixes were made... how annoying... Frank _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: gcc 2.96 69?? Frank Jacobberger
- Re: gcc 2.96 69?? Hal Burgiss
- Re: gcc 2.96 69?? gerry
- Re: gcc 2.96 69?? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: gcc 2.96 69?? Hal Burgiss
- Re: gcc 2.96 69?? Bernhard Rosenkraenzer