Reply to message from Thomas Ribbrock on Wed, 13 Dec 2000, 09:45 <-0000>:

> On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 12:10:10AM -0600, David Talkington wrote:
> > Rob Yale wrote:
> >
> > >But if I'm using my ISPs pop and smtp servers, I don't need it on a
> > >workstation, right?
> >
> > Maybe.  If you're using a do-everything package like Netscape for
> > mail, you're right.  If you're using Pine, for instance, and you're
> > using fetchmail to, well, fetch mail, you'll need sendmail running,
> > because that's the mechanism by which fetchmail delivers to your
> > mailbox.
> [...]
>
> sendmail is the default, yes, but it's not required. fetchmail can be
> [ ... ]

There was a thread or two last month on this list (Subject was something
with 'mail' or so) where one could find help how to setup pine with
fetchmail and procmail (IIRC) -- I was asking for help, so one should find
these postings probably by looking for my name in the Red Hat archive
(address should be in the footer) ...

The Pine-procmail-fetchmail combo most of the time works great on my
machine (single-user, with Red Hat 6.1 on it), except for the fact that
until now I didn't find a way to stop Pine revealing the login user-name
in the X-Sender header ... :)

Although I'm new to Linux: it was not difficult to setup Pine this way,
with some help from this list ...

Regards.
Wolfgang
-- 
http://www.geocities.com/wolfgangpfeiffer/




_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to