On Mon, 27 Mar 2000, Tom Gilbert wrote: > > This is intentional: 0.16.x adds a load of bloat^H^H^H^H^Hfeatures that > > That's just FUD, and I can't believe it came from someone who should > know better. Like I've said before, I have nothing to do with the enlightenment RPM (or enlightenment development in general), and I don't use it (nothing against it, but I prefer the good old /dev/tty* "window manager"), so I was just repeating what I've heard about it. Sorry if the information I was given is wrong. LLaP bero -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspective Jason Costomiris
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspe... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's pe... Jason Costomiris
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer'... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A develo... Jason Costomiris
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A d... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A d... Isaiah Weiner
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A d... Mike Erickson
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspective Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspe... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's pe... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer'... Tom Gilbert
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A develo... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspective Samuel Flory
- Re: Enlightenment in 6.2. A developer's perspective Earl Heather