more than one industry pundit ("pundit", from the Latin: "pun",
meaning "person", and "dit", meaning "who is paid to write about
things they do not understand"), has pointed out a rather amusing
conundrum in which SCO finds itself.

  as we all know, SCO has its own version of linux it has been
peddling.  but in order for this not to violate the GPL, SCO
must have already agreed that everything in its distribution
is also GPLed.

  therefore, SCO is now suing IBM for adding (alleged) SCO IP
to linux that SCO itself must, according to the GPL, have made
GPL-available through its own distribution.

  i'm sure this would be more amusing with the help of 
various pharmaceuticals.

rday



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to