I have name server on 486DX 100Mhz with 20M RAM. Upgraded to RH5.0 in December.
Never had problems so far. Surely doesn't look like RH5.0 problem to me
Mike
Serge Pluess wrote:
> Hi there
>
> just wanted to give some comments to my experiences with RedHat 5.0 as a
> sever.
>
> I had 4.2 running on a pentium 200MHZ with 80MB of Ram. It was running bind
> version 4.9.6 and apache 1.2.5. The machine would be up and running for weeks.
>
> Then I decided to try out 5.0 and started from scratch, installing all the
> packages. Configured just the nameserver and let it go.
> After 2 days the nameserver was gone, just quit running. Rebooting, wait
> about 2 days and the same happened again.
> So I decided to get the source code and compile it freshly, but the same
> happened again after about 2 days.
>
> After sending some messages to various mailing lists and newsgroups I
> finally gave up, reinstalled 4.2 and the machine has been ever so happy
> again since then not requiring any restart.
>
> So, for the moment I can only say that to run bind 4.9.x you should
> probably stick with RH 4.2.
>
> Greetings
>
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com/RedHat-FAQ /RedHat-Errata /RedHat-Tips /mailing-lists
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
