[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> IMHO, it would be a very good idea to have a 100% posix-compliant /bin/
> sh without any extensions. /bin/sh should *not* be symlinked to /bin/
> bash.
Did you read the documentation?
Here's another fragment:
Major Differences From The SVR4.2 Bourne Shell
----------------------------------------------
* Bash is POSIX-conformant, even where the POSIX specification
differs from traditional `sh' behavior.
_______________________________________________
Redhat-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
