> John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Just what's in a src.rpm that's so useful that is NOT in the spec file? > > Patches? You don't need them to see how it was built;-) Well, not unless it was configured by patching, and I HAVE seen that done. Anything else? _______________________________________________ Redhat-devel-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-devel-list
- Re: binary packages to include specs Levente Farkas
- Re: binary packages to include specs Frank Hale
- Re: binary packages to include specs Alan Shutko
- Re: binary packages to include specs John Summerfield
- Re: binary packages to include specs Mike A. Harris
- Re: binary packages to include specs Levente Farkas
- Re: binary packages to include specs Mike A. Harris
- Re: binary packages to include specs John Summerfield
- Re: binary packages to include specs Alan Shutko
- Re: binary packages to include specs Mike A. Harris
- Re: binary packages to include specs John Summerfield
- Re: binary packages to include specs Thomas Dodd
- Re: binary packages to include specs John Summerfield
- Re: binary packages to include specs Mike A. Harris
- Re: binary packages to include specs John Summerfield
- binary packages to include specs Viorel Anghel