> > > > While I'm not the one to make such decisions, I'd say that we'll > > switch to gcc when it becomes feasible to do so. In any case, > > we'll work on removing the compiler dependencies out of the > > distribution. > > > > Spec files are made for people who are supposed to be knowledgeable > enough for editing them and replace the string egcs by gcc so this > is not a problem. Oh. I thought they existed so anyone can build the packages the same way the packager did, perhaps using different libraries. That is, they're there to make a sysadmin's life easier. Silly me. -- Cheers John Summerfield http://os2.ami.com.au/os2/ for OS/2 support. Configuration, networking, combined IBM ftpsites index. -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to egcs. (again) John Summerfield
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to egcs. (aga... Svante Signell
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to egcs. ... Andrew E. Mileski
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to eg... John Summerfield
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to egcs. ... John Summerfield
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to egcs. (again) Bill Nottingham
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to egcs. (aga... JF Martinez
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to egcs. ... Andrew E. Mileski
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to eg... JF Martinez
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded t... Andrew E. Mileski
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to egcs. ... John Summerfield
- Re: rawhide: qlibc-2.1.spec hardcoded to egcs. (aga... JF Martinez