Matthew Campbell wrote: > > H. Peter Anvin writes: > > Either way, rc.local should be for *local* stuff. Just like /usr/local, > > it should be *empty*. > > I suppose the code that makes an issue file with the Red hat release > and kernel version could go in a script under /etc/rc.d/init.d, > perhaps called makeissue, and that script could go in the initscripts > or redhat-release package. Then if someone wants to customize > /etc/issue, they can either create their own issue file (by hand) and > turn off makeissue with something like ntsysv, or they could add code > in /etc/rc.d/rc.local that changes, adds to, or overwrites the issue > file. > Yes, this is the right way to do it. -hpa -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private! -- To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
- console color code location? Al Elia
- Re: console color code location? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code location? Kevin Waterson
- Re: console color code location? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code location? Bill Nottingham
- Re: console color code location? H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code location... Bill Nottingham
- Re: console color code loca... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code loca... Matthew Campbell
- Re: console color code loca... H. Peter Anvin
- Re: console color code loca... John Summerfield
- Re: console color code loca... R P Herrold
- mandated charceters in user... Kevin Waterson
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Ray Atnip
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Kevin Waterson
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Alan Shutko
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Chris Garrigues
- Re: mandated charceters in ... John Summerfield
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Kevin Waterson
- Re: mandated charceters in ... Elliot Lee