No hydrometer, no log book, many cells at different SG and probably no battery 
monitor = neglect, wasted resources and, as you said, unbelievably expensive 
consequence. I hope you can communicate to the customer that this was his fault 
and not the battery maker. 

Larry



On Dec 17, 2015, at 8:29 AM, Luke Christy <sgsrenewab...@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks Guys, for the feedback. 

I reduced the system to one string when I was on site, and it is maintaining, 
though the remaining "good" batteries had a lot of variance in the SG between 
cells.

I don't think the cells in these particular batteries are removable (at least 
not by me), as the interconnections are welded and it does not look like it 
would be easy to pull them out of the case anyway. As Jay pointed out, even if 
that were possible, replacing the cells with new ones seems like throwing away 
money.

The charge parameters were set kind of low ~58V Bulk and 61V EQ.

I know the homeowner has not been using SG to equalize, as he doesn't even have 
a way to check the SG period.

Tommy Penson was kind enough to contact me off-list, and his recommendation was 
to increase the charge parameters and spend some time trying to bring the bad 
cells back up with careful charging and longer EQ cycles.  Seems like that is 
worth doing even if it's not successful, considering the expensive alternative.

-Luke
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to