Jarmo,


The sun’s geometry is not nearly that simple. To understand the impact of 
north-facing arrays, you have to perform a simulation. PV:WATTS does this just 
fine and it is easy to show that a 18-degreed North-facing tilt produces 75% of 
a perfect 30-degree south-facing array. Far more than your assumption of 50%.



To compare 15-degrees South to 15-degrees North, the numbers are slightly 
better at 77%. We are going to see a lot of north-facing arrays once people 
understand that low tilt angles are very forgiving on North slopes. Steep 
slopes are a totally different story and you have to run the numbers….



Bill.



From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf 
Of jarmo.venalai...@schneider-electric.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 8:04 AM
To: RE-wrenches <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Using the North Facing Roof



I did a slide on the effect of North facing modules.  For even a fairly 
aggressive rotation North as shown, the effect is "only" a 50% reduction.

The questions of whether or not to do it, are,

- is the mounting structure simpler, lower cost
- security against wind
- can I put a larger array on the roof  (typically yes, if you make back to 
back pyramid shaped structures)
- overall, what is the cost versus benefit

JARMO
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Jarmo Venalainen  |   Schneider Electric   |  Xantrex Brand  |   CANADA  |   
Sales Application Engineer
Phone: +604-422-2528  |   Tech Support: 800-670-0707  |   Mobile: +604-505-0291
Email:  <mailto:jarmo.venalai...@schneider-electric.com> 
jarmo.venalai...@schneider-electric.com  |   Site: <http://www.xantrex.com/>  
www.Xantrex.com  |   Address: 3700 Gilmore Way, Burnaby, BC V5G4M1


 <http://www.xantrexrebate.com/>


 <http://www.xantrex.com/>

 <https://www.facebook.com/Xantrex>

 <https://twitter.com/Xantrex>

 <https://twitter.com/Xantrex>




*** Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail





From:

"Peter Parrish" <peter.parr...@calsolareng.com 
<mailto:peter.parr...@calsolareng.com> >


To:

"'RE-wrenches'" <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org 
<mailto:re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org> >,


Date:

07/28/2015 12:22 AM


Subject:

[RE-wrenches] Using the North Facing Roof


Sent by:

"RE-wrenches" <re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org 
<mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org> >



  _____




I recently read a short piece that caught me up short, and I quote:

“The fast dropping cost of solar, while a huge boon to the adoption of solar 
PV, has counter-intuitively altered design parameters. No longer is the 
north-facing roof considered unusable because limited application in less-than 
optimal orientations can still show a positive net benefit. Arrays are thus 
designed now with elements or sub-arrays in these locations, increasing overall 
kW installation while reducing the energy production per capacity installed. 
This might have been anticipated based on sheer economic analysis from a users 
perspective, but so long has solar been expensive that these less optimal 
orientations were never seriously considered.”

I doubt that the individual who wrote this piece came to these conclusions 
him/herself. Does anyone know of a recent article that argued this perspective? 
Is this an emerging design practice? If so, I’d like to know more about it.

-          Peter

Peter T. Parrish, Ph.D.
President, SolarGnosis
1107 Fair Oaks Ave., Suite 351
South Pasadena, CA 91030
(323) 839-6108
peter...@pobox.com <mailto:peter...@pobox.com>



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org 
<mailto:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>

Change listserver email address & settings:
 <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org> 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive:  
<http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html> 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to