Marco,

        "Chinese and Taiwanese continue to get hammered with these tariffs."    
  In any game, if you're not playing fair, you get penalized.

        Yes, I too thank SolarWorld for producing a very high quality product 
here in the USA at a reasonable cost, less polluting production methods and 
being there for me to back up their panels in the long run.  For myself and my 
customers, it feels good to know that our dollars are staying here in the 
states, boosting our economy.  Some Chinese PV companies have already come and 
gone in the rush to the bottom we saw a couple years ago. There are not doubt 
some Chinese PVs that are quality built but  many will follow the same path of 
anything else purchased from Walmart mentality...low upfront cost, early 
failure and a bad name for solar.  

        And its not just SolarWorld that should take the credit for the tariff 
bashing comments, though they have been willing to be the target for the few 
survivors here in the US.  My understanding is now there is an increase in 
production (and producers) domestically due to a leveling of the PV playing 
field.

        
Bill
Taylorsville, CA
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Marco Mangelsdorf 
  To: 'RE-wrenches' 
  Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 10:14 AM
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] module testing


  Thanks, Jarmo.  Sounds important to know.

   

  India-based Tata Power Solar (yes, Power Solar not Solar Power) is looking 
into getting into the U.S. market in a bigger way and they’re working with TUV 
in Arizona.

   

  Be interesting to see who fills the increasing void as far as module 
suppliers as the Chinese and Taiwanese continue to get hammered with these 
tariffs.  Thank you, SolarWorld!

   

  marco

   

  From: RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On 
Behalf Of jarmo.venalai...@schneider-electric.com
  Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 7:43 AM
  To: RE-wrenches
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] module testing

   

  Hi: 

  The "cTUVus"  mark is accredited by OSHA (NRTL), and considered equivalent to 
UL and CSA by city , county and state regulators throughout the US. 

  The thing to check is that the applicable "cTUVus" standard was applied.  In 
this case the test needs to be the cTUVus equivalent of UL1703. 

  Here's a link to the TUV doc which outlines the above. 

  http://www.tuv.com/media/usa/nabrochures/Product_Safety.pdf 

  As always, the AJH has the final say. 

  JARMO
  
_____________________________________________________________________________________
 

  Jarmo Venalainen  |   Schneider Electric   |  Solar Business  |   CANADA  |   
Training & Development Specialist - Senior 
  Phone: +604-422-2528  |   Fax: +604-420-1591  |   Mobile: +604-505-0291 
  Email: jarmo.venalai...@schneider-electric.com  |   Site: www.SEsolar.com  |  
 Address: 3700 Gilmore Way, Burnaby, BC V5G4M1 


  *** Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 




        From: 
       "Marco Mangelsdorf" <ma...@pvthawaii.com> 
       
        To: 
       "'RE-wrenches'" <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org>, 
       
        Date: 
       12/22/2014 09:15 AM 
       
        Subject: 
       [RE-wrenches] module testing 
       
        Sent by: 
       "RE-wrenches" <re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org>
       

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------




  Hola. 
    
  Does anyone know….For the U.S. market, is TUV certification to UL 1703 
considered adequate? 
    
  I’ve always thought that modules sold in the U.S. had to have actual testing 
and certification by U.L. directly or another nationally recognized test lab. 
    
  Thanks, 
  marco 


  ______________________________________________________________________
  This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
  
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
  List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

  List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

  Change listserver email address & settings:
  http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

  List rules & etiquette:
  www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

  Check out or update participant bios:
  www.members.re-wrenches.org



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

  List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

  Change listserver email address & settings:
  http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

  List rules & etiquette:
  www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

  Check out or update participant bios:
  www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to