Flipping through the '04 plumbing code I see a few slopes called out (1/4" per 1' for fixture vents, 1" per 1' for circuit vents, 1/2" per 1' for combination drain/vent...). Fixture vents have a maximum distance of a few feet from fixture trap to vent, but I don't think this prevents you from then running that vent horizontally. 916.2 states that for vents other than stack vents or vent stacks if your vent is >40' you need to upsize the whole vent pipe (tough to do for an existing building, of course). Stack vents have a "maximum developed length" of 100' for a 1.5" vent which should be enough space to get away from under the PV. I don't see any slope requirements specifically for stack vents but my non-plumber's eye may be missing something.

The stack vent sizing Table 916.1 appears (in part) here too and it looks like the tables match up to a 2.5":
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/drainage-vents-d_1110.html

DKC



On 2014/9/24 10:19, Jason Szumlanski wrote:
I am unable to find anything in the Florida code that precludes covering a plumbing vent. The code does require the vent to be 6" above the roof surface I believe.

I was unable to determine if these vents need to be vertical with no bends in the attic. Obviously you wouldn't want to create a trap in the attic, but a couple of 45's to relocate a plumbing vent to accommodate more PV seems like a desirable thing to do sometimes. Does anyone know if these can be relocated, i.e. to an adjacent roof surface?

On my own home I had a vent to deal with. I broke out my saws-all, split the lead like a banana and peeled it back, cut the pipe at an angle, and folded the lead back into the pipe after applying sealant between the lead and pipe. There is a 1" gap between the rim of the pipe and the back of the module. My theory on this working safely is that, a) there will be far less rainwater falling in and around this pipe with a module over it, and b) it is about 24" from the roof ridge and there is a module over it so there will be very little water sheeting down from above the vent. Code notwithstanding, I felt this was a solid method on my own home, and I have inspected it after 6 months of Florida downpours and found no issues.


Jason Szumlanski

Fafco Solar


On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Bill Loesch <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    Bruce, August, et al,

    This is but one more example of confusing terminology. A plumbing
    vent is not an exhaust vent!

    A plumbing vent (what August calls a cold vent) is provided to
    allow the sanitary drain traps (and perhaps more) to operate
    properly. Without the properly functioning traps you would have
    sewer gas smell and sewer gas from the plumbing fixtures. This was
    commonplace when indoor plumbing was introduced to early adopters.

    An exhaust vent is another animal entirely. An exhaust vent
    carries the combustion products to a suitable exterior location
    for dilution with ambient air. With the advent of power vented
    combustion appliances, a direct vent (one that takes in combustion
    air from the outside and naturally exhausts combustion products to
    the outside) is IMHO the only responsible way to install any power
    vented appliance in a freezing climate. (Power vented appliances
    come in both condensing and non-condensing flavors-they can
    penetrate the side wall or the roof). Originally, two separate
    pipes (with two independent properly separated penetrations) was
    used. That technique is still often used today. More recently
    concentric vents have been introduced both for condensing and
    non-condensing applications. A concentric vent can simplify some
    installations by putting the exhaust pipe inside a larger air
    intake pipe allowing for one, albeit larger, penetration. As you
    might imagine if the exhaust flow is hindered/diverted/redirected
    by an inappropriately located solar module combustion gasses will
    be re-ingested into the intake air. Not good for equipment
    performance. My understanding is the power vented _appliance
    manufacturer_ dictates what kind of separation/clearances are
    needed with their product. My guess is you find they want at least
    a foot of separation between the top of the " inverted cone" and
    the module. Probably not what you had in mind for an aesthetically
    pleasing installation.

    I hope this helps,

    Bill Loesch
    Solar 1 - Saint Louis Solar
    314 631 1094  <tel:314%20631%201094>

    On 23-Sep-14 6:54 PM, August Goers wrote:
    Bruce and All, Sorry, I hit send before I had a chance to
    complete my thoughts. What I meant to say was that I've found
    AHJs often allow us to cover cold plumbing vents but I've never
    tried or had any luck with covering hot vents including
    condensing boiler PVC vents. Once again, if in doubt you could
    see what the plan checker or inspector thinks. Best, August
    -----Original Message----- From: August Goers
    [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014
    4:15 PM To: 'RE-wrenches' Subject: RE: [RE-wrenches] Modules over
    vents Bruce, I'll send you the CA plumbing code vent section
    offlist (attachment too large for this list). The way I read the
    code is that you technically can't cover any type of plumbing or
    hot vent. However, and I've run into little resistance from AHJs
    in the Bay Area by covering these. You might want to check in
    with your plan checker. Best, August Luminalt -----Original
    Message----- From: RE-wrenches
    [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
    Bruce Leininger Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3:49 PM To:
    RE-wrenches Subject: [RE-wrenches] Modules over vents Hi all.
    We're designing a system on a roof that is literally infested
    with plumbing, exhaust and combustion vents. The combustion vents
    are PVC and none of the vents are more than 1.5' above the roof.
    A racking company says that we can cover them with modules, since
    the modules will be at least 4' above the roof. They have not yet
    provided any building code references to say that this is ok. Do
    any of you know if the building code allows this? Thanks. Bruce




_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to