Yep they make them

http://w3.usa.siemens.com/powerdistribution/us/en/product-portfolio/meter-load-center/Documents/SIE_BR_SOLAR.pdf

Jay




> On Apr 30, 2014, at 6:56 AM, Jason Szumlanski <ja...@fafcosolar.com> wrote:
> 
> Yeah, #10 wire is pretty cheap, especially when purchased in bulk, as are 
> readily available 100A Square D NEMA 3R load centers and breakers. There 
> isn't a great cost savings in terms of material. Sometimes it's just easier 
> to make a single home run. Every job is different. We do it both ways.
> 
> Sometimes there isn't enough space near the meter or existing distribution 
> for both a combiner and fusible disconnect or there are obstructions that 
> make it impractical. There are aesthetic concerns (usually overblown by the 
> homeowner or HOA). 
> 
> ​What we really need is for Square D to start making main distribution 
> equipment with dedicated supply side lugs with OCPD built in. One can 
> dream...​
> 
> 
> Jason
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 9:44 AM, jay peltz <j...@asis.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>> 
>> Always good to get a different view on how to do it. 
>> I've always found it easier and cheaper to pull the circuits off the roof to 
>> the AC combiner, so my overcurrent is in a different location
>> 
>> Jay
>> Peltz power
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 5:08 AM, Jason Szumlanski <ja...@fafcosolar.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Each microinverter string needs dedicated overcurrent protection. If 
>>> combining strings on the roof for a single run back to the interconnection 
>>> point, you need each string to have it's own breaker/fuse. The other option 
>>> is to run each string back to the interconnection point separately, but for 
>>> a 10kW system you have to do a supply side connection anyway on as typical 
>>> 200A service, so combining strings somewhere is necessary, and a single run 
>>> from the roof makes sense in many cases.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Jason Szumlanski 
>>> ​Fafco Solar​
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 6:40 PM, jay peltz <j...@asis.com> wrote:
>>>> Follow up to Bill's point.
>>>> 
>>>> For Micros I've installed a disconnect on the roof, but never a breaker or 
>>>> fuse
>>>> Why install a breaker?
>>>> 
>>>> jay
>>>> 
>>>> peltz power
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 29, 2014, at 9:43 AM, Bill Hoffer wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dave
>>>>> 
>>>>> I agree, in the case of microinverters, you already have a main PV System 
>>>>> disconnect at the Load Panel to shut down the system that is readily 
>>>>> accesible.  I would consider the disconnect on the roof as a supplemental 
>>>>> disconnect for the purposes of maintenance by authorized personal that 
>>>>> only needs to be accessible.  
>>>>> 
>>>>> Bill
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Dave Click <davecl...@fsec.ucf.edu> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I think 240.24(A)(4) allows the installation of the inverter OCPDs in 
>>>>>> the SolaDeck hidden under a module.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 240.24 Location in or on Premises.
>>>>>> (A) Accessibility. Overcurrent devices shall be readily accessible and 
>>>>>> shall be installed so that the center of the grip of the operating 
>>>>>> handle of the switch or circuit breaker, when in its highest position, 
>>>>>> is not more than 2.0 m (6 ft 7 in.) above the floor or working platform, 
>>>>>> unless one of the following applies:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>> (4) For overcurrent devices adjacent to utilization equipment that they 
>>>>>> supply, access shall be permitted to be by portable means.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And if panelboards / fused safety switches are allowed to have 
>>>>>> screwed-down covers over the OCPDs, I'd think that installing a 
>>>>>> removable module over these OCPDs would meet NEC. I guess an AHJ could 
>>>>>> argue that this requires TWO covers be removed, unlike a panelboard or a 
>>>>>> switch.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> DKC
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 2014/4/29, 11:15, Jason Szumlanski wrote:
>>>>>>> 690.9(D) is not applicable to the original discussion because we were 
>>>>>>> talking about an Inverter output circuit, not a PV Source or Output 
>>>>>>> circuit.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 690.34 may apply if you call a SolaDeck with breakers a junction box, 
>>>>>>> but I can see that being a stretch in the mind of many. 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> My and Ray's question about the screws on the SolaDeck cover itself 
>>>>>>> requiring a tool to render it accessible is still an issue if the 
>>>>>>> breakers themselves need to be "readily accessible," but that would 
>>>>>>> also apply to a Midnite MNPV, which also has a cover with a screw.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jason Szumlanski
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2014 5:57 PM, Bill Brooks wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Read 690.9(D) and 690.34. Not sure where this “hysteria—run for the 
>>>>>>>>> border” sentiment is coming from.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> 690.9(D) Photovoltaic Source and Output Circuits. Listed PV
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> overcurrent devices shall be required to provide overcurrent
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> protection in PV source and output circuits. The overcurrent
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> devices shall be accessible but shall not be required to
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> be readily accessible.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> 690.34 Access to Boxes. Junction, pull, and outlet boxes
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> located behind modules or panels shall be so installed that
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> the wiring contained in them can be rendered accessible
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> directly or by displacement of a module(s) or panel(s) secured
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> by removable fasteners and connected by a flexible
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> wiring system.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> This is not a change. Please help me understand the concern.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> Bill Brooks.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> From: re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org 
>>>>>>>>> [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] On Behalf Of Ray 
>>>>>>>>> Walters
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 2:23 PM
>>>>>>>>> To: RE-wrenches
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] (no subject)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> Interesting so does "require a tool" include taking a screw off the 
>>>>>>>>> cover plate of the combiner box, too?
>>>>>>>>> What a game changer.  I'm going to Mexico for my next project; I'll 
>>>>>>>>> actually enjoy even more being the sole AHJ on the project.  
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> R.Ray Walters
>>>>>>>>> CTO, Solarray, Inc
>>>>>>>>> Nabcep Certified PV Installer, 
>>>>>>>>> Licensed Master Electrician
>>>>>>>>> Solar Design Engineer
>>>>>>>>> 303 505-8760
>>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2014 2:52 PM, Michael Morningstar wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Readily accessible is now defined in the 2014 NEC. Installing OCPD’s 
>>>>>>>>> underneath a module is a major faux paux, and I can’t imagine any AHJ 
>>>>>>>>> thinking otherwise. Having to remove a module in order to reset a 
>>>>>>>>> breaker, what a drag.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> "Capable of being reached quickly for operation, renewal or 
>>>>>>>>> inspection without requiring those concerned to use a tool, to climb 
>>>>>>>>> over, remove obstacle or other.”
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> Michael
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 28, 2014, at 10:29 AM, William Miller 
>>>>>>>>> <will...@millersolar.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> You call it a solar panel, I call it a glass j-box cover plate. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> William
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Miller Solar
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 28, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Jason Szumlanski <ja...@fafcosolar.com> 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> If that is the interpretation,
>>>>>>>>> I don't see how the breakers are "readily accessible" in a SolaDeck
>>>>>>>>> mounted anywhere, regardless of whether it is under a module. It
>>>>>>>>> requires removal of four screws (using a tool) to access the breakers
>>>>>>>>> inside the enclosure. It's all up to the AHJ. It has not been an issue
>>>>>>>>> locally here. I can see how other jurisdictions may not
>>>>>>>>> concur.
>>>>>>>>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> 
> Change email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to