Given the feedback, I will do the following for 6.3.2:
- Change the prefix for `https://schema.org` from `sdo` to `schema` - Change the default bindings from `core` to `rdflib`, which is the same behaviour as in 6.1.1 - Add a docstring with recommendations from Wes. On Wednesday, 22 March 2023 at 13:38:52 UTC+1 miel.van...@meemoo.be wrote: > As somebody recently ran into issue wrt to default namespaces, I second > the policy Wes proposes. > > I'm not a big fan of binding namespaces by default because of the lack of > transparency, but that ship has sailed. > The ability to have prefix aliases would be very nice, but tricky wrt to > serialising. I would prefer an easy rebinding method or some sort (if not > already present). > > Best, > > Miel > > Op di 21 mrt 2023 om 14:00 schreef Wes Turner <wes.t...@gmail.com>: > >> Perhaps the stated policy on namespace bindings - maybe in comments at >> the top of the file - should be?: >> >> - Do not break namespace bindings that are specified in a major or minor >> release. >> >> - First, copy the W3C RDFa/JSON-LD Recommended Context namespace bindings >> >> - Justify additional custom namespace bindings in a PR >> >> - As necessary, always specify the complete list of namespace bindings >> for your RDF document, or use the RDFa/JSONLD default context. >> >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 6:15 PM Nicholas Car <ni...@kurrawong.net> wrote: >> >>> I'm happy for wgs to be added back in and also happy for schema to be >>> added. If both schema and sdo can co-exist then great. >>> >>> There was, I think, some push-back on the idea of binding more prefixes >>> by default, but I don't see the problem, as I've outlined here: >>> https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/issues/2103#issuecomment-1477005612 >>> >>> I think we should err on the side of making things work "out of the box" >>> and if there are prefixes people don't like, they can re-bind them. Most of >>> the prefixes listed in the "rdflib" set are pretty un-controversial but the >>> set can never be perfect for everyone! >>> >>> Nick >>> ------- Original Message ------- >>> On Tuesday, March 21st, 2023 at 05:56, Wes Turner <wes.t...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> All of these have `schema` as the QName, so IMO "`sdo:` is a new >>> optional alias for `schema:`" would have been the non-breaking change: >>> >>> - "RDFa Core Initial Context, JSON-LD Recommended Context" >>> https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-rc >>> - https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-rc/context.jsonld >>> >>> - https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/schema >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 3:10 PM Iwan Aucamp <auca...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Writing this just to inform everyone of some potentially >>>> conterversial-to-fix regressions. >>>> >>>> The following yet unaddressed regressions were introduced with Bind >>>> prefixes choices #1686 <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/pull/1686> >>>> that was first released in 6.2.0: >>>> >>>> - The namespaces bound by default for Graphs is very different than >>>> in was in 6.1.1 [#2103 >>>> <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/issues/2103>] >>>> - The unreleased binding of the wgs prefix was dropped [#2196 >>>> <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/issues/2196>]. >>>> - The prefix for `https://schema.org` was changed from `schema` to >>>> `sdo` [#2294 <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/pull/2294>] >>>> >>>> >>>> The `wgs` issue is fairly uncontroversial I think, I will just add it >>>> back, but the others are a bit controversial. >>>> >>>> Changing the default bound namespaces breaks code that worked with >>>> 6.1.1. Now it has been some time since 6.2.0, so likely people have got >>>> over it, but it is still a regression, and technically the right thing to >>>> do will be to fix it, though given how much time has passed that will >>>> likely just make everyone upset again from scratch. >>>> >>>> Fixing the change to the `https://schema.org` prefix binding is also >>>> controversial I think, but probably less so, I'm sure if we fix it we will >>>> break some existing code out there. It would maybe be okay to bind it >>>> twice, (i.e. bind `sdo` and `schema` for `https://schema.org`) but >>>> another regression broke the ability to do this. >>>> >>>> I would really appreciate any input here. I'm going to merge a PR that >>>> adds `wgs` back, but for the default bindings and the change in `schema` >>>> prefix I'm going to just treat them as wonfix unless there is some >>>> feedback >>>> from the community. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Iwan Aucamp >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://github.com/RDFLib >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "rdflib-dev" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to rdflib-dev+...@googlegroups.com. >>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/dac7d60c-6f26-4a9d-961d-950348659250n%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/dac7d60c-6f26-4a9d-961d-950348659250n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >>> http://github.com/RDFLib >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "rdflib-dev" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to rdflib-dev+...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/CACfEFw8ygoRu9Tcbj-C8xMmvBtZKHKO5ova6%2B8cZSTfRd2fe-g%40mail.gmail.com >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/CACfEFw8ygoRu9Tcbj-C8xMmvBtZKHKO5ova6%2B8cZSTfRd2fe-g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://github.com/RDFLib >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "rdflib-dev" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to rdflib-dev+...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/CZF6bWscyr_gMRjkjPPRcUSsWDYM2TEWBE3C72lZDim6fs15VdMRPu_aS9z_fxzUoKnn2IjFnlBJgGNfqsRX8LROaklvOGxVQDLI2bM_VGA%3D%40kurrawong.net >>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/CZF6bWscyr_gMRjkjPPRcUSsWDYM2TEWBE3C72lZDim6fs15VdMRPu_aS9z_fxzUoKnn2IjFnlBJgGNfqsRX8LROaklvOGxVQDLI2bM_VGA%3D%40kurrawong.net?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- >> http://github.com/RDFLib >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "rdflib-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to rdflib-dev+...@googlegroups.com. >> > To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/CACfEFw_ngxFo-fHknN-%3D5w5hzQqWwMgO0H31vcKm1LC0DdBKOA%40mail.gmail.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/CACfEFw_ngxFo-fHknN-%3D5w5hzQqWwMgO0H31vcKm1LC0DdBKOA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- http://github.com/RDFLib --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rdflib-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/cd6101bd-8590-4098-b26d-5a83e34f5aabn%40googlegroups.com.
