All of these have `schema` as the QName, so IMO "`sdo:` is a new optional alias for `schema:`" would have been the non-breaking change:
- "RDFa Core Initial Context, JSON-LD Recommended Context" https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-rc - https://w3c.github.io/json-ld-rc/context.jsonld - https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/schema On Mon, Mar 20, 2023, 3:10 PM Iwan Aucamp <aucam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Writing this just to inform everyone of some potentially > conterversial-to-fix regressions. > > The following yet unaddressed regressions were introduced with Bind > prefixes choices #1686 <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/pull/1686> that > was first released in 6.2.0: > > - The namespaces bound by default for Graphs is very different than in > was in 6.1.1 [#2103 <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/issues/2103>] > - The unreleased binding of the wgs prefix was dropped [#2196 > <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/issues/2196>]. > - The prefix for `https://schema.org` was changed from `schema` to > `sdo` [#2294 <https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/pull/2294>] > > > The `wgs` issue is fairly uncontroversial I think, I will just add it > back, but the others are a bit controversial. > > Changing the default bound namespaces breaks code that worked with 6.1.1. > Now it has been some time since 6.2.0, so likely people have got over it, > but it is still a regression, and technically the right thing to do will be > to fix it, though given how much time has passed that will likely just make > everyone upset again from scratch. > > Fixing the change to the `https://schema.org` prefix binding is also > controversial I think, but probably less so, I'm sure if we fix it we will > break some existing code out there. It would maybe be okay to bind it > twice, (i.e. bind `sdo` and `schema` for `https://schema.org`) but > another regression broke the ability to do this. > > I would really appreciate any input here. I'm going to merge a PR that > adds `wgs` back, but for the default bindings and the change in `schema` > prefix I'm going to just treat them as wonfix unless there is some feedback > from the community. > > Regards > Iwan Aucamp > > -- > http://github.com/RDFLib > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "rdflib-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/dac7d60c-6f26-4a9d-961d-950348659250n%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/dac7d60c-6f26-4a9d-961d-950348659250n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- http://github.com/RDFLib --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rdflib-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/CACfEFw8ygoRu9Tcbj-C8xMmvBtZKHKO5ova6%2B8cZSTfRd2fe-g%40mail.gmail.com.
