Thin-lines do increase opening width of calipers in one (common) scenario:
the back of the pads hit the fork legs/seat stays, preventing any further
opening.  Thin lines delay that limit a bit, and aren't as thick, so they
block the egress of the fat tire less.

Think about it this way:  a door knob hit the wall when the door is fully
open.  If you change that door knob for one that stuck out less from the
door, the door would open more widely.  Plus, the inside doorknob wouldn't
catch on your hip as easily when you walk through.

If you have ample fork/stay clearance, than what you said is true, Bill.
Most Rivendells have ample fork/stay clearance, but the early ones had less
than current ones.  Then, you're limited only by the opening width of the
brake, something unique to sidepull brakes.

I agree that centerpulls would open completely; Paul Racer Medium's would
be a great fit for this bike.  I didn't realize that Dia Compe 610s were in
production again, but it looks like Gran Compe level ones are available at
VO.  Purdy!

Tim


On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Bill Lindsay <tapebu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> "One way to get brakes to open wider:  use Kool-stop "Thinline" pads."
>
> I respectfully disagree with this.  It is true that if your brakes are
> adjusted for "thick" brakepads and then you just replace your thick
> brakepads with Koolstop Thinlines, that the brakes will open wider.... BUT
> ... your brakes will no longer be adjusted.  They'll be way too loose.
>  Readjust the brakes for the thinner pads and now you are right back where
> you started, not able to open wide enough to get your tire out.
>
> I'm running 700x35 Paselas on the Windsor.  They measure a true 36mm on my
> widish rims (in fact they measure wider than my 700x38 C-Lines, so weird!).
>  Anyway, I have an old DiaCompe 610 in front.  I have a QR on my cable
> hanger, and then I use that slack to disengage the straddle cable.  That
> way I can get the front wheel out without deflating.
>
> I think the modern Dia Compe 610 brakes or the Paul Racer M's would be
> very smart on a Redwood.
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 1:35:09 PM UTC-8, Tim Gavin wrote:
>>
>> http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/rambouillet/rambflyer/index.html
>>
>> The Rambouillet fits up to 700x38mm tires, according to the flyer.  The
>> Redwood flyer also claims 700x38 clearance:
>>
>> http://www.cyclofiend.com/rbw/romulus/redflyer/index.html
>>
>> Silver brakes and 750 centerpulls will have too long of reach (55-73mm)
>> to be compatible with a Riv Red/Rom/Ram. (I have a red Riv Road).  Red rum?
>>
>> Tektro 539 brakes are the most common current "standard reach" (47-57mm)
>> brakes for these bikes, and they're what Riv sells.  They have pretty good
>> fender/tire clearance.  I don't know if they open any wider than the stock
>> Shimano brakes.
>>
>> One way to get brakes to open wider:  use Kool-stop "Thinline" pads.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to